Stop Annoying Your Customers: Evolve to Marketing with Meaning Instead

October 9th, 2009

The title of this post is the name of a new book from Bob Gilbreath. Bob is the Chief Marketing Strategist for a well-regarded ad agency, Bridge Worldwide. He captures how the world of marketing is shifting from a push-based — “Interrupt, Tell & Sell” — to a pull-based mode of marketing. This is marketing that people desire to interact with.

Altus partner, Dave Chase, delves into this further in an iMediaConnection.com article titled “Social, meaningful marketing through online video“. It’s worth a read.

Article Highlights:

  • Online video is providing new ways to “market with meaning”
  • Educational video has been embraced by companies whose product explanations require more than 30 seconds
  • The increasing overlap between social media and video is driving increased levels of consumer engagement

Optimizing healthcare sales revenue is the focus of new division at Altus Alliance

September 15th, 2009

The following is a press release announcing Tim Fitzpatrick joining Altus Alliance to lead a new healthcare I.T. practice:

Federal stimulus funding and technology reforms are causing many companies to directly target the dynamic and growing healthcare technology market.

Tim Fitzpatrick, an industry veteran with 22 years of healthcare sales and business development experience will be leading Altus’s new healthcare division and will be working closely with partner Dave Chase, the founder of Microsoft’s healthcare division and MSHUG-the Microsoft Health Users Group.

“We’re pleased to have Tim as part of the Altus Alliance” says Dave Chase. “His depth of experience, contacts and skills will help Altus expand beyond our technology focus and into the evolving Healthcare market.”

“Healthcare technology and especially healthcare information technology is in gold rush mode” says Mr. Fitzpatrick, “Our focus is to help companies develop and execute a sales strategy that will significantly increase their healthcare revenues. We are not here to provide “whiteboard consulting” but rather to bring our experience and contacts to bear and deliver an immediate impact on healthcare sales revenue and business development traction.”

Mr. Fitzpatrick feels that the current dynamics of the healthcare market is creating opportunities for new companies as well as existing firms and technologies.

“If your company is a new venture with a healthcare focus, we will help you plan, execute and scale your sales. If you are an existing firm that is somewhat horizontal but with applicable healthcare technologies, this is one market you should consider giving a significant vertical focus.”

About Altus Alliance-For ten years, the partners of Altus Alliance have refined methodologies around market assessment, business development traction and sales optimization to accelerate revenues and ensure healthy growth for new ventures. The combination of a proven track record, Fortune 100 experience and deep knowledge of the challenges faced by early stage companies enables Altus to help clients identify and execute against the best growth opportunities and optimize the sales process to maximize revenue traction.

Start but don’t end with YouTube for online video marketing

September 11th, 2009

According to Forrester, a webpage is 50 times more likely to show up on the first page of search results if there is video on that page. It’s no wonder that Altus client Delve Networks is seeing its business grow dramatically. Altus partner, Dave Chase, had an article published in iMediaConnection sharing his insights on how YouTube is useful as a starting point for online marketing but has several shortcomings.  For example, Chase was working on a presentation and wanted to highlight GE’s Ecomagination image campaign. The first video search result was on Metacafe and had the GE image video juxtaposed with an ad for a video game with very prominently displayed scantily clad women. We doubt this was the image GE hoped to convey.

Read more about tips for marketing beyond YouTube with video.

Article Highlights:

  • comScore figures indicate that 21.4 billion videos were watched in the U.S. — up 88 percent from a year ago
  • A good video platform enables essentially infinite customization of the player
  • Modern video platforms can aid greatly in facilitating video SEO

4 Reasons NOT to listen to the siren song of the Channel too early

September 8th, 2009

Over the last 10 years at Altus, and for many before that, we have seen, or sometimes (unfortunately) been a part of, many misguided efforts to prematurely develop an alternate or indirect sales channel. Entrepreneurs often mistake a channel partner for an armed and ready sales force. Or they are simply in a rush to become a global company before testing and validating the product and sales process in their own backyard.  And in these tough economic times in particular, the compulsion to grow a channel and the factors the effect their success are even more prominent.  Here are the top 4 reasons why I’ve seen premature efforts at developing channels fail.

1.  The Product is not Proven

We worked with one client with a cleaver advertising technology. Early in the initial launch cycle, an opportunity popped up with what could have been a large and strategic partner in taking our product to market.  With very little field results and nothing more than blind faith in the development, we jumped on the opportunity and quickly secured a large and joint customer.

Unfortunately, the product failed to deliver as promised which resulted in a black eye with the end customer and more importantly with the goose that was to lay the golden eggs. The simple truth was that the product wasn’t ready; it hadn’t been rigorously tested either in house or with smaller beta clients.

2.  Lack of Demand

To this day we still get sucked into the trap of beefing up forecasts too high based on the belief that the new market leading channel partner is going to add our widget to their line-up.  More often than not, unless you are the ones feeding the demand (or there are performance guarantees), the partner will likely come up short of your expectations.  The relationship gets strained right out of the gate and the certain success is a big question mark.

The safer assumption is that channels are good for fulfillment, not for demand. Don’t expect your partner to market your product and drive demand.  If it happens, great…just don’t sign them up, check the box as mission complete and move on to the next market or territory.  They may sell it, but they likely aren’t dependent on its success—at least not the way you are. The ideal scenario is you spur the demand and then you channel (pun intended) that demand to your partner, even if you could satisfy it on your own. This way you get your partner started down the right road, give them some experience selling your product, and pave the way for a mutually beneficial relationship. Do not get lured into the trap of selling partnerships instead of customers.

3.  Lack of Sales Tools

We had one client in the Telco space where the CEO was a master at the pitch and demo and was a high-odds closer.  Following a few big wins, they believed it was time to bring on a channel.  However, again the expectations were not met, in this case because the partners did not have the CEO’s talent and experience.  Even more than the company’s own sales team, channel partners are hugely dependent on easy and effective sales tools to close deals.  Unfortunately, most of the time a misalignment occurs in which the company expects the partner to have the tools and skill required and the partner on the other hand expects them to be supplied.  Often more problematic is when the partner does not even ask and the result is an ill-equipped channel team that simply does not deliver.  Have you armed your partner with the tools—an ROI calculator, case studies, PowerPoint’s, demos, white papers, brochures, one-sheets, etc? Have you given them a proven process with proven tools? “Just get people on the phone and talk to them” may have worked for you, but that is not a scalable recipe for channel success.

4.  Lack of Sales Support

Last but not least—do you have dedicated resources to support the channel? One Altus client, a media entertainment company, successfully recruited a number of data partners that were logical and complementary to their offering.  But beyond the initial sales training there were no resources dedicated to supporting them. The results were again a shortfall of expected and planned revenues largely because the follow-up to questions and overall availability of sales and technical support was too slow.  To be effective and meet those forecasts you should have the same level  (if not greater) of customer-experienced support all fully available and prioritized to be responsive and proactive. Ideally there is a period of mentoring and team selling that both helps see how the process is done effectively and builds a strong rapport between the teams created.

So perhaps the adage, ‘Be careful what you wish for’ is a good one to keep in mind as you think about channel expansion. I’ve seen companies desperately wish for a channel partner and then get it, only to find that they weren’t ready. They didn’t have a ready product, or the necessary demand, or the tools and processes and people needed to support their partner. The result is often worse than a failed customer because of the broader reach.  What looked like a boon can sometimes be a bane.

Stretching video budgets with the cloud

August 9th, 2009

Altus partner, Dave Chase, had an article published in the leading Internet marketing publication iMediaConnection.com

Article Highlights:

  • Being first isn’t always the best strategy when it comes to emerging media
  • Publishers are finding more affordable ways to deliver video content over the cloud
  • By only getting charged for the traffic they generate, publishers are less hesitant to join the fray

Go to iMedia to read more about Internet Video Platforms.

3 Lies Businesses Tell Themselves About Being Market Driven

August 3rd, 2009

We’ve worked with over 60 early-stage companies over the past decade to provide our Market Driven Baseline (MDB) services, helping companies to truly understand the market for their product or service, including the key players in the sales process, and to tweak their value proposition accordingly. In the course of working with these companies, as well as observing others, we’ve noticed the 3 most common ways in which businesses fool themselves into thinking they are market-driven.

1. We are solving a real problem
Just because you have a cool idea or a gadget that makes something easier doesn’t mean you are solving a problem. This is especially important in this down economy as the focus has shifted from the “nice-to-do’s” to the “must-do’s”. Gone are the days when the budget allowed for nifty enhancements of existing tools. Unless you are addressing some aching problem in the market with clear and quantifiable ROI, you will soon be relegated to the dot-com dustbin alongside such businesses as mylackey.com, which essentially offered a “nice-to-do” solution to a problem you could deal with on your own for little extra effort.

2. We know who our customers are
This is perhaps the biggest one. When people tell us they know who their customers are, we say “Great!” Our next question is: Have you interviewed your employees, your competitors, your customers, your competitive wins and losses, and iterated on your solution several times? Generally, they haven’t, and they don’t fully know the:
-  motivations behind the purchase
-  how those motivations are affected by customer and employee perceptions
-  competitive offerings and their effect on the value proposition
-  key decision makers, economic buyers, and influencers
-  attributes of a “perfect customer”
-  common or likely reservations to a purchase

One chronic problem is the tendency to overstate your market, and not understand the difference between TAM and SAM. One client targeted the SMB market. Their vision was to become the hub for all small- and medium-sized business product and service sales. Unfortunately, this is a large, diverse, and unwieldy target market. The key decision maker for the purchase of office supplies is likely different from the key decision maker for facilities management. A value proposition may resonate with one and not the other. On the flip side, instead of picking too large of a segment that could be difficult to defend, some companies pick too small of a niche or the wrong segment altogether. We all know we need to, but few of us take the appropriate time to systematically and methodically research our market and our value within it—a critical step to laying the foundation for a successful company.

3. We understand the sales process.
Nothing is more upsetting than watching a salesperson waste precious time courting the wrong person. So many times we have seen the key decision maker be identified and wooed only to watch the economic buyer or the chief influencer kill the sale. Decisions are rarely made by a single, autonomous person; rather they are made by several people, sometimes even a committee. Therefore, the most important thing for a young company to learn is the decision-making environment inside of their client companies. We’ve talked about the need for the right people in the right roles (see ‘Hunters and Farmers’ and ‘Renaissance and Coin-operated’), but first you must understand what role you need to play, and to whom. Recently, I watched as a company spent most of its sales resources courting the VP of Sales (successfully, too) only to watch as the CFO, holding the purse strings, and the founder, with his personal allegiances, scuttle the deal. Before you think you can sell a software package to HR, make sure it’s not really the IT department that has the say.

Building a house without laying a foundation is dangerous and misguided; so too is building a company without thoroughly understanding the market. These are both enormous investments of time and money, and they both deserve the kind of systematic, methodical approach that can minimize risk and maximize the likelihood of success. It is cheaper in the short run not to have to lay that foundation, but don’t expect the house to last long.

The Right Hire for Early Stage Sales

July 10th, 2009

Sales is an odd function in early stage companies.  The traditional salesperson is tasked with presenting the company story in front of as many prospects as possible.  If those prospects are not responsive, move on to the next.  The best salespeople get fewer no’s and cycle faster.  In a start up, the situation is different and the role even more critical.  Generating revenue is still paramount and product pitching is the daily focus;  but now the cash from those sales becomes the immediate and essential life-blood of the company.   Beyond revenue, Sales often carries the additional responsibility of ensuring customer satisfaction, accumulating market feedback, acquiring competitive intelligence, defining product requirements, assessing vertical and channel strategies, and being a key influencer in the company’s morale and momentum.  However, many startup leaders still hire their initial sales team based on the traditional sales profile and the desired quota performance with little consideration for these elements.

Mark Leslie, founder of Veritas and currently professor at Stanford, calls the traditional class of salesman “coin-operated”, suggesting they are great at execution and tenaciously drive a consistent and proven process.  But in order to perform they require tools, infrastructure, and support that simply do not exist in a startup.  The result is missed forecasts and high turnover in the position.

One client with a SaaS offering approached Altus out of board pressure due to lower than expected sales.  What we found was two Quota Club Kings as regional reps; they were in the field and miles away from the product with limited support.  The repair was a few months of assessing the best sales process, identifying the target customer, and bringing in two inside reps matching a profile more consistent with a product manager–to listen, learn and share their experiences internally.  Now with a closer connection to the right customer, the closing ratio and sales cycle improved.

Another scenario we find in early stage sales is the under-hire, where precious cash has been allocated outside of sales and the plan is a junior rep / CEO tag team. This model creates the opposite challenge with relatively junior people trying to find, qualify, and manage prospects for the CEO to close.  Now you have a lack of experience, no process, no tools and often an incomplete product representing your company in the marketplace.  These recruits tend to thrash, driving more activity than results just to create an impression of productivity.   The result again is a weak qualified pipeline, missed targets, and often “bad revenue”—a customer willing to listen but who is ultimately not a good match to the product.  Now you have product development thrashing too.

We saw an example of this with an online offering looking for key partnerships and distribution.  Here the lower cost junior rep was able to build a large list of companies and activities that were not strategic or prioritized and the CEO was not able to support the volume while managing his other duties.  The repair was a senior part-time business development profile that could identify and close much bigger transactions with far bigger players.

Many leaders and boards believe ‘sales is sales’.  The perception is that a good sales person will always be good regardless of when or where you drop them.   While sometimes true, it is certainly not the case in the early stages of a company.  The profile of the best sales people for early stage is what we (and Leslie) refer to as Renaissance Salesperson.  The Renaissance rep is one who is more driven intellectually than financially.  He wants to learn and therefore asks questions and listens to what customers, and ideally markets, truly want and need. He evolves to what resonates with buyers and adapts quickly from one call to the next.  He likes to share his findings with the company and help to shape and evolve the product while it is still in its infancy. Most importantly, he is resourceful and can inform and persuade prospects with little infrastructure, support or materials.  He is challenged, intrigued, and motivated rather than frustrated and demanding more resources.

We recommend early stage companies begin their sales with this renaissance profile, and in small numbers, until a replicable model starts to take shape.  It is critical at this stage for the company to learn and adapt quickly and understand that results do not come quickly or easily with a sales group versed only in mature products and markets. This is the time to build the system that will henceforth guide the company’s sales (and perhaps marketing) strategy.

Once you can see the beginnings of a repeatable and scalable model you can now shape the sales organization into a high-yielding machine.  And just as sales people are not all created equal, neither is the makeup of a sales organizational model.   There are many different structures that can be implemented to maximize the cost, speed, and efficiency of sales, i.e.:
Inside / outside
Qualify / close
First sale / growth sale
Volume / relationship based
Direct/channel

Consequently these different models require different profiles of salespeople in order to be successful.  Failure to clearly understand and define the role will again translate into a bad hire, turnover, and loss of momentum and profits.

This recommendation is often hard for CEOs to accept because they need more revenue and rapid adoption and therefore bigger investments in sales. Most companies we begin working with tend to build to an immediate sales model based on their experience or council from established and successful companies in which they used to work and to which they aspire to return. However, just as a company evolves and matures its development cycle through prototypes, so too do sales strategies and tactics.

Although counterintuitive, the fastest path to the greatest revenue is to begin slowly with fewer salespeople until you feel a foundation capable of building on. They will burn far less money and create an environment where traditional sales will succeed.

Didn’t we learn anything from the childhood Tortoise and Hare story?

Delve Network’s “bailout program” another great example of guerilla marketing

June 30th, 2009

I blogged earlier about how Delve Networks used the Obama inaugural as a great example of one of their features to build buzz for their offering. They did another smart thing yesterday. One of their competitors, Maven Networks, had been acquired by Yahoo and was reported to be shutting down and they pounced on the story.

They must have caught wind of the impending news because as soon as news broke on Techcrunch they announced a Maven Networks shutdown bailout program. It’s clear they had their ducks in a row as when one Googles “Maven Networks” or “Maven Networks shut down“, the top results include the story on their offer to Maven Networks customers being abandoned by Yahoo.

Optimum Energy Secures $4.5 Million to Fuel Company Growth, Accelerate Sales of HVAC Energy Efficiency Software

June 17th, 2009

Optimum Energy has been an Altus Alliance client for the last year or so. Bill Lawler has led a Sales Process Optimization (SPO) project adding HVAC sytems to the list of different markets sectors where SPO has worked. Other successes have ranged from SaaS, Online Advertising, Higher Ed lead generation, enterprise software and more. The press release detailing the funding round for Optimum is appended below. Congratulations to Nathan, Gary, Jim and Ben.


SEATTLE, Wash. — June 17, 2009 — Optimum Energy, LLC, provider of Ultra High Performance HVAC software solutions that set a new standard in energy efficiency, today announced it has secured a commitment of up to $4.5 million in equity financing  led by investor, LLC. Leveraging the success of OptimumHVACTM, third-generation heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) energy efficiency software introduced in October 2008, this financing will be used to respond to broad scale demand from the market. Based on current operating plans, Optimum Energy does not anticipate future funding rounds.

“Columbia Pacific invests in and operates a diversified set of businesses,” said Stan Baty, managing member, Columbia Pacific Advisors. “Optimum Energy is at the top of our portfolio on three important criteria: customer value proposition, financial model, and alignment with market trends. It offers building owners proven economic payback along with environmental credentials. Optimum Energy has succeeded in building its business efficiently and now is poised for profitable revenue growth as it rides the wave of demand-generating legislation and investment.”

Optimum Energy’s solution is based on Hartman technologies that have achieved or exceeded projected reductions in energy use in more than 60 installations across the U.S. Optimum Energy’s active pipeline of sales opportunities is currently more than $25 million, consisting of approximately 180 projects in a wide range of facilities, including: commercial high rise office towers, schools and universities, data centers, federal and state government facilities, hotels, casinos, airports and shopping centers.

“Since the company was founded in 2005, we’ve been focused on a capital efficient validation of market size and the performance of our technology,” said Nathan Rothman, CEO and founder of Optimum Energy. “Now that we’ve demonstrated the scalability and persistent results our software solution provides, we’re expanding our sales and engineering teams to respond more quickly to increasing market demand. This round of funding positions us well to serve this growing market and realize our revenue goals.”

Management Team

Today Optimum Energy announced the naming of Bert Hogue to chief financial officer, and Gary Gigot, Microsoft and Visio alumnus, to chief marketing officer. Optimum Energy’s management team also includes Nathan Rothman, B.E.P., CSDP, CEO and founder; Jim Hanna, vice president and founder; and Ben Erpelding, P.E., C.E.M., director of engineering. The company is currently recruiting a vice president of sales. 

Optimum Energy is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, with satellite offices in California, Texas and New York.

OptimumHVAC Solutions

Optimum Energy’s standard software solution is targeted at facilities equipped with centrifugal chiller plants and/or variable air volume HVAC systems.

For each project, Optimum Energy’s Engineering Services group provides a scope of work, projects savings and calculates return on investment, including applicable utility incentives. Payback typically falls into the 18 to 36 month range. Optimum Energy then delivers those projected savings with OptimumHVAC software, resulting in increased operating efficiency that lasts the life of the plant. OptimumHVAC also gives facility managers the ability to measure and validate HVAC performance anytime, anywhere, via a secure Web site.

About Optimum Energy, LLC

Based in Seattle, Washington, Optimum Energy’s reliable, demand-based Ultra High Performance HVAC optimization software applications are proven to reduce commercial building HVAC energy consumption and operating costs up to 60 percent. More information is available at www.optimumenergyHVAC.com.

Chase keynoting “Joining the Conversation”

May 22nd, 2009

Altus partner, Dave Chase, will be the featured keynote speaker at the “Joining the Conversation” event in Memphis on May 28. The Memphis Daily News interviewed Chase in advance of his speech.

Chase will speak about how all businesses are essentially publishers these days. As both a longtime marketing executive and a publisher, he’ll lend his experience as a publisher to these new “publishers”. Included in his speech will be topics heretofore thought of as a publisher’s responsibility but have parallels for businesses of all sizes in their marketing. These include the following:

  • Editorial planning
  • Breaking News
  • Syndication
  • Content as marketing
  • Metrics & Analytics

He’ll wrap up highlighting the opportunities in what Jeff Jarvis calls The Great Restructuring.  He’ll highlight businesses that have taken advantage of past economic downturns and built some of America’s most successful companies.