Start but don’t end with YouTube for online video marketing

September 11th, 2009

According to Forrester, a webpage is 50 times more likely to show up on the first page of search results if there is video on that page. It’s no wonder that Altus client Delve Networks is seeing its business grow dramatically. Altus partner, Dave Chase, had an article published in iMediaConnection sharing his insights on how YouTube is useful as a starting point for online marketing but has several shortcomings.  For example, Chase was working on a presentation and wanted to highlight GE’s Ecomagination image campaign. The first video search result was on Metacafe and had the GE image video juxtaposed with an ad for a video game with very prominently displayed scantily clad women. We doubt this was the image GE hoped to convey.

Read more about tips for marketing beyond YouTube with video.

Article Highlights:

  • comScore figures indicate that 21.4 billion videos were watched in the U.S. — up 88 percent from a year ago
  • A good video platform enables essentially infinite customization of the player
  • Modern video platforms can aid greatly in facilitating video SEO

4 Reasons NOT to listen to the siren song of the Channel too early

September 8th, 2009

Over the last 10 years at Altus, and for many before that, we have seen, or sometimes (unfortunately) been a part of, many misguided efforts to prematurely develop an alternate or indirect sales channel. Entrepreneurs often mistake a channel partner for an armed and ready sales force. Or they are simply in a rush to become a global company before testing and validating the product and sales process in their own backyard.  And in these tough economic times in particular, the compulsion to grow a channel and the factors the effect their success are even more prominent.  Here are the top 4 reasons why I’ve seen premature efforts at developing channels fail.

1.  The Product is not Proven

We worked with one client with a cleaver advertising technology. Early in the initial launch cycle, an opportunity popped up with what could have been a large and strategic partner in taking our product to market.  With very little field results and nothing more than blind faith in the development, we jumped on the opportunity and quickly secured a large and joint customer.

Unfortunately, the product failed to deliver as promised which resulted in a black eye with the end customer and more importantly with the goose that was to lay the golden eggs. The simple truth was that the product wasn’t ready; it hadn’t been rigorously tested either in house or with smaller beta clients.

2.  Lack of Demand

To this day we still get sucked into the trap of beefing up forecasts too high based on the belief that the new market leading channel partner is going to add our widget to their line-up.  More often than not, unless you are the ones feeding the demand (or there are performance guarantees), the partner will likely come up short of your expectations.  The relationship gets strained right out of the gate and the certain success is a big question mark.

The safer assumption is that channels are good for fulfillment, not for demand. Don’t expect your partner to market your product and drive demand.  If it happens, great…just don’t sign them up, check the box as mission complete and move on to the next market or territory.  They may sell it, but they likely aren’t dependent on its success—at least not the way you are. The ideal scenario is you spur the demand and then you channel (pun intended) that demand to your partner, even if you could satisfy it on your own. This way you get your partner started down the right road, give them some experience selling your product, and pave the way for a mutually beneficial relationship. Do not get lured into the trap of selling partnerships instead of customers.

3.  Lack of Sales Tools

We had one client in the Telco space where the CEO was a master at the pitch and demo and was a high-odds closer.  Following a few big wins, they believed it was time to bring on a channel.  However, again the expectations were not met, in this case because the partners did not have the CEO’s talent and experience.  Even more than the company’s own sales team, channel partners are hugely dependent on easy and effective sales tools to close deals.  Unfortunately, most of the time a misalignment occurs in which the company expects the partner to have the tools and skill required and the partner on the other hand expects them to be supplied.  Often more problematic is when the partner does not even ask and the result is an ill-equipped channel team that simply does not deliver.  Have you armed your partner with the tools—an ROI calculator, case studies, PowerPoint’s, demos, white papers, brochures, one-sheets, etc? Have you given them a proven process with proven tools? “Just get people on the phone and talk to them” may have worked for you, but that is not a scalable recipe for channel success.

4.  Lack of Sales Support

Last but not least—do you have dedicated resources to support the channel? One Altus client, a media entertainment company, successfully recruited a number of data partners that were logical and complementary to their offering.  But beyond the initial sales training there were no resources dedicated to supporting them. The results were again a shortfall of expected and planned revenues largely because the follow-up to questions and overall availability of sales and technical support was too slow.  To be effective and meet those forecasts you should have the same level  (if not greater) of customer-experienced support all fully available and prioritized to be responsive and proactive. Ideally there is a period of mentoring and team selling that both helps see how the process is done effectively and builds a strong rapport between the teams created.

So perhaps the adage, ‘Be careful what you wish for’ is a good one to keep in mind as you think about channel expansion. I’ve seen companies desperately wish for a channel partner and then get it, only to find that they weren’t ready. They didn’t have a ready product, or the necessary demand, or the tools and processes and people needed to support their partner. The result is often worse than a failed customer because of the broader reach.  What looked like a boon can sometimes be a bane.

Stretching video budgets with the cloud

August 9th, 2009

Altus partner, Dave Chase, had an article published in the leading Internet marketing publication iMediaConnection.com

Article Highlights:

  • Being first isn’t always the best strategy when it comes to emerging media
  • Publishers are finding more affordable ways to deliver video content over the cloud
  • By only getting charged for the traffic they generate, publishers are less hesitant to join the fray

Go to iMedia to read more about Internet Video Platforms.

3 Lies Businesses Tell Themselves About Being Market Driven

August 3rd, 2009

We’ve worked with over 60 early-stage companies over the past decade to provide our Market Driven Baseline (MDB) services, helping companies to truly understand the market for their product or service, including the key players in the sales process, and to tweak their value proposition accordingly. In the course of working with these companies, as well as observing others, we’ve noticed the 3 most common ways in which businesses fool themselves into thinking they are market-driven.

1. We are solving a real problem
Just because you have a cool idea or a gadget that makes something easier doesn’t mean you are solving a problem. This is especially important in this down economy as the focus has shifted from the “nice-to-do’s” to the “must-do’s”. Gone are the days when the budget allowed for nifty enhancements of existing tools. Unless you are addressing some aching problem in the market with clear and quantifiable ROI, you will soon be relegated to the dot-com dustbin alongside such businesses as mylackey.com, which essentially offered a “nice-to-do” solution to a problem you could deal with on your own for little extra effort.

2. We know who our customers are
This is perhaps the biggest one. When people tell us they know who their customers are, we say “Great!” Our next question is: Have you interviewed your employees, your competitors, your customers, your competitive wins and losses, and iterated on your solution several times? Generally, they haven’t, and they don’t fully know the:
-  motivations behind the purchase
-  how those motivations are affected by customer and employee perceptions
-  competitive offerings and their effect on the value proposition
-  key decision makers, economic buyers, and influencers
-  attributes of a “perfect customer”
-  common or likely reservations to a purchase

One chronic problem is the tendency to overstate your market, and not understand the difference between TAM and SAM. One client targeted the SMB market. Their vision was to become the hub for all small- and medium-sized business product and service sales. Unfortunately, this is a large, diverse, and unwieldy target market. The key decision maker for the purchase of office supplies is likely different from the key decision maker for facilities management. A value proposition may resonate with one and not the other. On the flip side, instead of picking too large of a segment that could be difficult to defend, some companies pick too small of a niche or the wrong segment altogether. We all know we need to, but few of us take the appropriate time to systematically and methodically research our market and our value within it—a critical step to laying the foundation for a successful company.

3. We understand the sales process.
Nothing is more upsetting than watching a salesperson waste precious time courting the wrong person. So many times we have seen the key decision maker be identified and wooed only to watch the economic buyer or the chief influencer kill the sale. Decisions are rarely made by a single, autonomous person; rather they are made by several people, sometimes even a committee. Therefore, the most important thing for a young company to learn is the decision-making environment inside of their client companies. We’ve talked about the need for the right people in the right roles (see ‘Hunters and Farmers’ and ‘Renaissance and Coin-operated’), but first you must understand what role you need to play, and to whom. Recently, I watched as a company spent most of its sales resources courting the VP of Sales (successfully, too) only to watch as the CFO, holding the purse strings, and the founder, with his personal allegiances, scuttle the deal. Before you think you can sell a software package to HR, make sure it’s not really the IT department that has the say.

Building a house without laying a foundation is dangerous and misguided; so too is building a company without thoroughly understanding the market. These are both enormous investments of time and money, and they both deserve the kind of systematic, methodical approach that can minimize risk and maximize the likelihood of success. It is cheaper in the short run not to have to lay that foundation, but don’t expect the house to last long.

The Right Hire for Early Stage Sales

July 10th, 2009

Sales is an odd function in early stage companies.  The traditional salesperson is tasked with presenting the company story in front of as many prospects as possible.  If those prospects are not responsive, move on to the next.  The best salespeople get fewer no’s and cycle faster.  In a start up, the situation is different and the role even more critical.  Generating revenue is still paramount and product pitching is the daily focus;  but now the cash from those sales becomes the immediate and essential life-blood of the company.   Beyond revenue, Sales often carries the additional responsibility of ensuring customer satisfaction, accumulating market feedback, acquiring competitive intelligence, defining product requirements, assessing vertical and channel strategies, and being a key influencer in the company’s morale and momentum.  However, many startup leaders still hire their initial sales team based on the traditional sales profile and the desired quota performance with little consideration for these elements.

Mark Leslie, founder of Veritas and currently professor at Stanford, calls the traditional class of salesman “coin-operated”, suggesting they are great at execution and tenaciously drive a consistent and proven process.  But in order to perform they require tools, infrastructure, and support that simply do not exist in a startup.  The result is missed forecasts and high turnover in the position.

One client with a SaaS offering approached Altus out of board pressure due to lower than expected sales.  What we found was two Quota Club Kings as regional reps; they were in the field and miles away from the product with limited support.  The repair was a few months of assessing the best sales process, identifying the target customer, and bringing in two inside reps matching a profile more consistent with a product manager–to listen, learn and share their experiences internally.  Now with a closer connection to the right customer, the closing ratio and sales cycle improved.

Another scenario we find in early stage sales is the under-hire, where precious cash has been allocated outside of sales and the plan is a junior rep / CEO tag team. This model creates the opposite challenge with relatively junior people trying to find, qualify, and manage prospects for the CEO to close.  Now you have a lack of experience, no process, no tools and often an incomplete product representing your company in the marketplace.  These recruits tend to thrash, driving more activity than results just to create an impression of productivity.   The result again is a weak qualified pipeline, missed targets, and often “bad revenue”—a customer willing to listen but who is ultimately not a good match to the product.  Now you have product development thrashing too.

We saw an example of this with an online offering looking for key partnerships and distribution.  Here the lower cost junior rep was able to build a large list of companies and activities that were not strategic or prioritized and the CEO was not able to support the volume while managing his other duties.  The repair was a senior part-time business development profile that could identify and close much bigger transactions with far bigger players.

Many leaders and boards believe ‘sales is sales’.  The perception is that a good sales person will always be good regardless of when or where you drop them.   While sometimes true, it is certainly not the case in the early stages of a company.  The profile of the best sales people for early stage is what we (and Leslie) refer to as Renaissance Salesperson.  The Renaissance rep is one who is more driven intellectually than financially.  He wants to learn and therefore asks questions and listens to what customers, and ideally markets, truly want and need. He evolves to what resonates with buyers and adapts quickly from one call to the next.  He likes to share his findings with the company and help to shape and evolve the product while it is still in its infancy. Most importantly, he is resourceful and can inform and persuade prospects with little infrastructure, support or materials.  He is challenged, intrigued, and motivated rather than frustrated and demanding more resources.

We recommend early stage companies begin their sales with this renaissance profile, and in small numbers, until a replicable model starts to take shape.  It is critical at this stage for the company to learn and adapt quickly and understand that results do not come quickly or easily with a sales group versed only in mature products and markets. This is the time to build the system that will henceforth guide the company’s sales (and perhaps marketing) strategy.

Once you can see the beginnings of a repeatable and scalable model you can now shape the sales organization into a high-yielding machine.  And just as sales people are not all created equal, neither is the makeup of a sales organizational model.   There are many different structures that can be implemented to maximize the cost, speed, and efficiency of sales, i.e.:
Inside / outside
Qualify / close
First sale / growth sale
Volume / relationship based
Direct/channel

Consequently these different models require different profiles of salespeople in order to be successful.  Failure to clearly understand and define the role will again translate into a bad hire, turnover, and loss of momentum and profits.

This recommendation is often hard for CEOs to accept because they need more revenue and rapid adoption and therefore bigger investments in sales. Most companies we begin working with tend to build to an immediate sales model based on their experience or council from established and successful companies in which they used to work and to which they aspire to return. However, just as a company evolves and matures its development cycle through prototypes, so too do sales strategies and tactics.

Although counterintuitive, the fastest path to the greatest revenue is to begin slowly with fewer salespeople until you feel a foundation capable of building on. They will burn far less money and create an environment where traditional sales will succeed.

Didn’t we learn anything from the childhood Tortoise and Hare story?

Delve Network’s “bailout program” another great example of guerilla marketing

June 30th, 2009

I blogged earlier about how Delve Networks used the Obama inaugural as a great example of one of their features to build buzz for their offering. They did another smart thing yesterday. One of their competitors, Maven Networks, had been acquired by Yahoo and was reported to be shutting down and they pounced on the story.

They must have caught wind of the impending news because as soon as news broke on Techcrunch they announced a Maven Networks shutdown bailout program. It’s clear they had their ducks in a row as when one Googles “Maven Networks” or “Maven Networks shut down“, the top results include the story on their offer to Maven Networks customers being abandoned by Yahoo.

Optimum Energy Secures $4.5 Million to Fuel Company Growth, Accelerate Sales of HVAC Energy Efficiency Software

June 17th, 2009

Optimum Energy has been an Altus Alliance client for the last year or so. Bill Lawler has led a Sales Process Optimization (SPO) project adding HVAC sytems to the list of different markets sectors where SPO has worked. Other successes have ranged from SaaS, Online Advertising, Higher Ed lead generation, enterprise software and more. The press release detailing the funding round for Optimum is appended below. Congratulations to Nathan, Gary, Jim and Ben.


SEATTLE, Wash. — June 17, 2009 — Optimum Energy, LLC, provider of Ultra High Performance HVAC software solutions that set a new standard in energy efficiency, today announced it has secured a commitment of up to $4.5 million in equity financing  led by investor, LLC. Leveraging the success of OptimumHVACTM, third-generation heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) energy efficiency software introduced in October 2008, this financing will be used to respond to broad scale demand from the market. Based on current operating plans, Optimum Energy does not anticipate future funding rounds.

“Columbia Pacific invests in and operates a diversified set of businesses,” said Stan Baty, managing member, Columbia Pacific Advisors. “Optimum Energy is at the top of our portfolio on three important criteria: customer value proposition, financial model, and alignment with market trends. It offers building owners proven economic payback along with environmental credentials. Optimum Energy has succeeded in building its business efficiently and now is poised for profitable revenue growth as it rides the wave of demand-generating legislation and investment.”

Optimum Energy’s solution is based on Hartman technologies that have achieved or exceeded projected reductions in energy use in more than 60 installations across the U.S. Optimum Energy’s active pipeline of sales opportunities is currently more than $25 million, consisting of approximately 180 projects in a wide range of facilities, including: commercial high rise office towers, schools and universities, data centers, federal and state government facilities, hotels, casinos, airports and shopping centers.

“Since the company was founded in 2005, we’ve been focused on a capital efficient validation of market size and the performance of our technology,” said Nathan Rothman, CEO and founder of Optimum Energy. “Now that we’ve demonstrated the scalability and persistent results our software solution provides, we’re expanding our sales and engineering teams to respond more quickly to increasing market demand. This round of funding positions us well to serve this growing market and realize our revenue goals.”

Management Team

Today Optimum Energy announced the naming of Bert Hogue to chief financial officer, and Gary Gigot, Microsoft and Visio alumnus, to chief marketing officer. Optimum Energy’s management team also includes Nathan Rothman, B.E.P., CSDP, CEO and founder; Jim Hanna, vice president and founder; and Ben Erpelding, P.E., C.E.M., director of engineering. The company is currently recruiting a vice president of sales. 

Optimum Energy is headquartered in Seattle, Washington, with satellite offices in California, Texas and New York.

OptimumHVAC Solutions

Optimum Energy’s standard software solution is targeted at facilities equipped with centrifugal chiller plants and/or variable air volume HVAC systems.

For each project, Optimum Energy’s Engineering Services group provides a scope of work, projects savings and calculates return on investment, including applicable utility incentives. Payback typically falls into the 18 to 36 month range. Optimum Energy then delivers those projected savings with OptimumHVAC software, resulting in increased operating efficiency that lasts the life of the plant. OptimumHVAC also gives facility managers the ability to measure and validate HVAC performance anytime, anywhere, via a secure Web site.

About Optimum Energy, LLC

Based in Seattle, Washington, Optimum Energy’s reliable, demand-based Ultra High Performance HVAC optimization software applications are proven to reduce commercial building HVAC energy consumption and operating costs up to 60 percent. More information is available at www.optimumenergyHVAC.com.

Chase keynoting “Joining the Conversation”

May 22nd, 2009

Altus partner, Dave Chase, will be the featured keynote speaker at the “Joining the Conversation” event in Memphis on May 28. The Memphis Daily News interviewed Chase in advance of his speech.

Chase will speak about how all businesses are essentially publishers these days. As both a longtime marketing executive and a publisher, he’ll lend his experience as a publisher to these new “publishers”. Included in his speech will be topics heretofore thought of as a publisher’s responsibility but have parallels for businesses of all sizes in their marketing. These include the following:

  • Editorial planning
  • Breaking News
  • Syndication
  • Content as marketing
  • Metrics & Analytics

He’ll wrap up highlighting the opportunities in what Jeff Jarvis calls The Great Restructuring.  He’ll highlight businesses that have taken advantage of past economic downturns and built some of America’s most successful companies.

Website Conversion – Making your Website Work for You

May 13th, 2009

This is the first in a series of Internet Marketing whitepapers drawn from my 15 years of doing marketing on the Internet. I start with the most common shortcoming I’ve seen with small company websites – i.e., the lack of focus on converting “lookers into bookers” on company websites. Instead many companies focus on getting traffic but don’t turn those into lasting relationships.

The goal is to capture the essence as there’s nearly infinite information on every topic. This is part of a larger endeavor to capture the intellectual property of Altus Alliance. In addition, these how-to’s have been a collaborative effort with Matt Heinz of Heinz Marketing. Matt worked for me early in his career and remains one of the best team members I have ever worked with. He’s the kind of professional I like working with. He doesn’t have a PhD…he has a GSD (Gets Stuff Done). All of the topics we cover assume the tight resources of a startup business as opposed to having a large, specialized marketing team. No fluff in these papers.

For a copy of the whitepaper, please fill out the form below. Below the form is the introduction to the whitepaper.

Introduction

Most organizations spend more time and money promoting their websites than they do optimizing existing conversion rates of visitors to their site. Because increasing website conversion is one of the most effective ways to increase profitability at the visitor level, knowing how to measure and improve conversion is vital to success with Internet marketing. This is one of the longest sections due to its importance.

Conversion defined: Conversion rates are distinct measurements that determine how many of your prospects take your preferred action step. Typically, micro-conversions (for instance, reading different pages on your site, or signing up for a newsletter) lead to your main conversion step (making a purchase, or contacting you for more information).

The most common thing we hear from businesses when they are disappointed with their web marketing is something along the lines of “I got people to my website but the campaign just didn’t work”. Let’s draw an analogy with a real world experience. Imagine you had someone helping your business by getting people to step inside your store who expressed an interest in your product. You would think that that person did their job as long as they got people who were relevant to your business to step inside your store. That’s where your job as the business owner begins. Imagine if that shopper who stepped inside wasn’t greeted by anyone, couldn’t find where your merchandise was located, found old merchandise after roaming around, couldn’t find where to check out and when they finally crossed paths with someone all they did was they wanted to talk about how great their store was rather than find out what the shoppers needs were. This is the real world equivalent of the experience visitors to many websites have. It’s no wonder that results for many business websites are abysmal with this kind of experience.

Who is responsible for that shopper’s experience – the person helping get people inside your store or you? Successful businesses that have been around awhile intuitively know the experience they want their customers to have in their real world interactions whether they are an insurance agent or a retailer. They need to pay as much attention to the website experience or they are wasting a lot of money on their marketing and website and missing out on countless opportunities. One business we worked with had a website for five years that didn’t have a big impact on their business. Applying a few of the tips outlined below, they increased sales from their site 129% from March 2008 to March 2009 — a time when most saw big declines in their business.

A website that serves your business should also serve your site visitor and should be like a good butler — butlers anticipate needs and work silently, as a good website should. Unfortunately, most websites aren’t designed with conversion in mind and thus there are missed opportunities whether people find your website independently or you sent them there via your efforts in your place of business or via your advertising.

Remember that once the visitor is at your website, your goal is to convert her — to turn her into a buyer or a lead. In most cases, the conversion you should focus on isn’t an instant sale. The most common activity for website visitors is to do research before they make a purchase online or offline (in local businesses serving local customers, 80% or more of the purchases will take place offline). Thus, you shouldn’t have the expectation that every visit will turn into a sale. If that’s all you design your website around and measure your success against, you’ll be missing out on lots of future opportunity. As mentioned in the Email Newsletter chapter, email marketing to your permission-based list is consistently the highest ROI marketing tactic there is.

Of course, if someone is ready to transact you don’t want any barriers in their way. At the same time, it would be well advised to put 80% of your focus on driving a conversion that is a lower commitment on the part of the visitor. Highlighted below are several ideas that would provide an incentive for a visitor to give you information about themselves. By collecting their email and other relevant information, this opens up a communications channel that will be vital to your success.

Clean Energy Trend: Energy Efficiency

April 14th, 2009

Altus client Optimum Energy has made major strides in the last year reaching a wide array of commercial buildings. In this interview on the Seattle Startup Buzz, Optimum Energy’s CEO shares where they are having success, the stimulus package’s impact on them, what others can learn from their experience and even a bit about Ken Griffey and Lance Armstrong. Read this interview with Nathan Rothman.